Scroll down for video

“Inconvenient truths” always seem problematic for Hillary Clinton, whether it’s attempting to destroy and obliterate emails or the reputation of woman who have been sexually assaulted by her husband, Hillary simply can’t tell the truth, even while the overwhelming evidence is staring her in the face.

And which Judge Jeanine Pirro once again asked publicly of Hillary "What’s more offensive, words or actions?"

Obviously Hillary would never subject herself to this type of cross-examination and with good reason, simply watch the good judge dismantle Hillary, piece by piece.

"The presidential election in 38 days comes down to the battle of political corruption versus truth—where one candidate chooses political correctness, [and] the other [is] brave enough to state the obvious," Pirro lamented.

She continued; “One says things not politically correct: not run through the prism of the contemporary political lens. The other...carefully filters [her words] and then flat-out lies to [our] faces," Pirro said, pointing to Hillary Clinton.

"You tell me what’s worse—name-calling or lying to grieving parents as their sons' bodies lay cold in caskets...and then turning around and calling those parents liars!"

Pirro continued with one verbal assault after another and at its conclusion one couldn’t help but wonder if only Pirro were one of those legislators on Capital Hill cross-examining Hillary, would the outcome be any different?


Source: Fox

Facebook Comment
JOIN U.S. HERALD Subscribe for FREE today and find out what's REALLY happening in America!

Send this to a friend