Scroll down for video

There’s little doubt after reviewing the preponderance of evidence against Hillary Clinton, and the way both the JOD and FBI conducted their investigations and perhaps more importantly themselves, that most critical thinking individuals will surmise something went terribly wrong.

The simple fact that the head of the Justice Department Loretta Lynch would sit huddled in conversation for over ½ hour with Bill Clinton, while Hillary Clinton was being investigated by the FBI speaks volumes of the obvious cover-up about to take place.

And the fact that the FBI granted immunity to computer specialist Paul Combetta, who worked for Platte River Networks in Colorado, simply reaffirms that everyone was on board with the cover-up.

Chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi Trey Gowdy is simply stating the obvious when he said: “If the FBI and the Department of Justice gave this witness transactional immunity, it is tantamount to giving the trigger-man immunity in a robbery case, it looks like they gave immunity to the very person you would most want to prosecute.”

Gowdy continued:

“You don’t give immunity to the person who actually robbed the bank,” you may want to give it to the getaway driver. You may want to give it to the person who helped them count the money afterwards, but you don’t give immunity to the person who walked in and robbed the bank. That ain’t that complicated, but that’s apparently what the FBI did.”

And there in lies the truth, in that nether the Justice Department nor the FBI were interested in uncovering the truth, and perhaps more likely than not, rather than uncovering the truth, they were an intricate part of destroying the evidence.



JOIN U.S. HERALD Subscribe for FREE today and find out what's REALLY happening in America!