screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-5-20-10-pm

For those that believe that this is actually a valid attempt to ensure an accurate electoral process, think again! In that Jill Stein’s attempt in requesting a recount is simply an attempt to fill her financial political purse for perhaps a future run.

In that to request a recount it would require that a “probable fraud” was committed. Moreover a 70,000 Trump spread in Pennsylvania would automatically negate any recall effort, simply because the margin of victory is too great, in that a recall would require a 10,000 vote margin between the two candidates.

screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-5-09-09-pm

Also Pennsylvania regulations a “prima facie case” simply put “actual evidence” that something nefarious took place.

screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-5-09-19-pm

Moreover Marc Elias Clinton’s legal council is on record stating the Clinton team “had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.

Elias also acknowledged even the closest margin state, Michigan, Trump’s win “well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount.”

However here’s the rub, while the Clinton’s aren’t pursuing any recount effort, the Clinton’s will participate in Stein’s funded effort to ensure fairness.

Obviously what is actually taking place is to “de-legitimize” President-elect Trump, purely as a political tactic and to undermine his authority to govern with progressive Democrats. It’s actually the same tactic used against President Bush, after he beat Al Gore.

Do you think Stein's real goal is to rake in some serious cash?

Let us know in the comments below.

 

 

 

Send this to friend